Before multifamily investing had hashtags, podcasts, and social media hype, it was simply a smart, steady way to build wealth.

Ten years ago, I wasn’t chasing trends—I was looking for stability, control, and long-term upside. Multifamily properties checked every box.

It Was About Cash Flow First

While many investors focused solely on appreciation, I focused on income. Multifamilies offered multiple rent streams under one roof, which meant less volatility and more consistency.

If one unit was vacant, the property still worked. That kind of built-in protection mattered—especially early on.

Less Risk Than It Looked

To me, multifamily investing felt safer, not riskier. The income was diversified across tenants, expenses were easier to manage at scale, and there was margin for error.

Living in one unit while renting the others also gave me firsthand experience—learning how properties truly perform, not just how they look on paper.

Control Over the Outcome

Multifamilies allowed me to actively influence the investment. By improving units, managing expenses, and reinvesting cash flow, I could intentionally build equity over time.

It wasn’t passive—but it was predictable.

Why Troy Made Sense Early

Long before Troy became a popular talking point, the fundamentals were clear: strong housing stock, walkable neighborhoods, nearby colleges and healthcare, and consistent rental demand.

Multifamily properties weren’t speculative here—they were practical housing for real people.

The Foundation for Everything Else

Those early multifamily investments shaped how I approach real estate today. They taught me how to analyze deals, manage risk, and think long-term instead of chasing what’s popular.

Before it was cool, multifamily investing was simply smart. And it still is.

If you’re considering investing—or want guidance grounded in real experience—I’m always happy to talk through what makes sense for your goals.